'Copyright law should be abolished entirely. No one can legitimately own creative works.'
[ support:0% : certainty:0 ] · [9 replies] · [0 comment]
arguments · summary
summary

title: 'Not abolished ENTIRELY'
text: 'Copyright could be changed to provide its same benefits (incentive to create) while removing its harmful and very real costs to society present in its current form:
-Shorter term-most creative work has, within 5 years, either made a profit or never will. Copyright should not be longer then this, then-it still would provide financial incentive without providing an excessively long restriction term.

-Returning to mandatory registration would eliminate the problems of "orphan works" and "untraceable holders"-anyone who wishes to present a work commercially would make use of a free and easy registration system, while allowing use to be made of the work of those who do not choose to explicitly register.

-Copyright should be considered an industrial regulation preventing unlicensed commercial use, not a restriction on individual consumers.'
tags:
date: 2005-09-29 19:20:50
submitter: seraphblade
effective: 0
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 1
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 1
repliesTotal: 1
comments: 0


Powered by Debatepoint.