-
support 80% · transcendental argumentmoderated to 100%; argued down by 20%
by wikipedia on 2005-03-26 05:20:34The Transcendental argument [en.wikipedia.org], which argues that logic, science, ethics, and other things we take seriously do not make sense if there is no God. Therefore, arguments against the existence of God must ultimately refute themselves if pressed with rigorous consistency. -
oppose 100% · Re: transcendental argumentmoderated to 100%; argued down by 0%
by anonymous on 2006-01-17 18:19:11From the wikipedia article: "Eventually we must arrive at a comprehensive law of regularity of succession that has no further explanation in the operation of deeper physical laws. It can only be established by the conscious choice of a free moral agent." In addition to the obvious error in Aquinas' thinking, I add that just because something is unknown does not mean it is unknowable.
summary
title: 'Re: transcendental argument'
text: 'From the wikipedia article: "Eventually we must arrive at a comprehensive law of regularity of succession that has no further explanation in the operation of deeper physical laws. It can only be established by the conscious choice of a free moral agent." In addition to the obvious error in Aquinas' thinking, I add that just because something is unknown does not mean it is unknowable.'
tags:
date: 2006-01-17 18:19:11
submitter: anonymous
effective: 1
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 1
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 0
repliesTotal: 0
comments: 0
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.