Debatepoint: vim is a better text editor than emacs

'vim is a better text editor than emacs'

[ support:0% : certainty:0 ] · [1 reply] · [0 comment]

parent point

oppose 0% · vim is not an editor

moderated to 0%; argued down by 0%
by anonymous on 2005-03-26 22:54:14

is just a simple tool to write text files an editor should allow you a lot more functionality, access to a shell in color mode, code writing in color mode, scripting, info, extensible modes, etc... in other words something like emacs is a lot closer to my concept of an editor there are features in emacs that are still not duplicated in windows products even after 10 years of being available under emacs that's a real editor

[ 0 replies · support · oppose · comment ]

arguments · summary

summary

title: 'vim is not an editor'
text: 'is just a simple tool to write text files an editor should allow you a lot more functionality, access to a shell in color mode, code writing in color mode, scripting, info, extensible modes, etc... in other words something like emacs is a lot closer to my concept of an editor there are features in emacs that are still not duplicated in windows products even after 10 years of being available under emacs that's a real editor'
tags:
date: 2005-03-26 22:54:14
submitter: anonymous
effective: 0
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 0
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 0
repliesTotal: 0
comments: 0

All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.