-
oppose 0% · Presuposition in the original questionmoderated to 0%; argued down by 0%
by anonymous on 2005-01-22 00:07:49Violence is neutral. It implies neither goodness or badness. It's like asking is pocket lint inherently bad.
|
supporting arguments
100% ·
[make argument]
by kosta on 2005-11-24 05:42:42
Your analogy to violence with cotton lint is quite naive,for cotton lint does not harm.If you go with that mindset you would also agree that torture , war and murder are also neutral.Which any sane mind would agree that they are not Violence is by far neutral. Rather violence is unquestionably a contributable factor in the deterioration of a given society.
|
opposing arguments
0% ·
[make argument]
no opposition arguments over 0%
|
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.