-
oppose 60% · theres no need for a Godmoderated to 100%; argued down by 40%
by ttnuagmada on 2007-12-28 22:31:01How does a God solve any problems? where did that God originate? Any excuse you can use for why a God has always been here, etc and simply be applied to the universe itself. if the universe has been here an infinite amount of time then how could anything have created it? there is no 50/50 chance that theres a God. there is no way of knowing the odds of something like that. i know christians find it to their advantage to use pseudo-science/math to try to make it seem like your beliefs have some sort of basis in reality, but they do not. and as for this "uncaused cause" nonsense, you're spewing about what philosophers thought about based on the very limited understanding of science and physics at the time. if any of you would do any real research you'd see that science has changed, and its not as simple as "uncaused cause" anymore. also theres no consideration for whether or not the universe has been here for an infinite amount of time. religion/gods/creators dont have a 50/50 chance of existing. there are no odds for something like that, based on OBSERVATION i would say religion has a 0% chance of existing.
summary
title: 'theres no need for a God'
text: 'How does a God solve any problems? where did that God originate? Any excuse you can use for why a God has always been here, etc and simply be applied to the universe itself. if the universe has been here an infinite amount of time then how could anything have created it? there is no 50/50 chance that theres a God. there is no way of knowing the odds of something like that. i know christians find it to their advantage to use pseudo-science/math to try to make it seem like your beliefs have some sort of basis in reality, but they do not. and as for this "uncaused cause" nonsense, you're spewing about what philosophers thought about based on the very limited understanding of science and physics at the time. if any of you would do any real research you'd see that science has changed, and its not as simple as "uncaused cause" anymore. also theres no consideration for whether or not the universe has been here for an infinite amount of time. religion/gods/creators dont have a 50/50 chance of existing. there are no odds for something like that, based on OBSERVATION i would say religion has a 0% chance of existing.'
tags: ttnuagmada,
date: 2007-12-28 22:31:01
submitter: ttnuagmada
effective: 0.6
support: 0
oppose: 1
stancePos: 2
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 3
repliesTotal: 3
comments: 0
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.