'teach evolution instead of creationism'
[ support:54% : certainty:51 ] · [31 replies] ·
[0 comment]
-
support 100% · unconstitutionalmoderated to 100%; argued down by 0%
by metric on 2005-01-14 11:40:28Creationism fails the Lemon test established by the Supreme Court in Lemov vs. Kurtzman: Under the Lemon test, a government-sponsored message violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment if: (1) it does not have a secular purpose, (2) its principal or primary effect advances or inhibits religion, or (3) it creates an excessive entanglement of the government with religion.
summary
title: 'unconstitutional'
text: 'Creationism fails the Lemon test established by the Supreme Court in Lemov vs. Kurtzman: Under the Lemon test, a government-sponsored message violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment if: (1) it does not have a secular purpose, (2) its principal or primary effect advances or inhibits religion, or (3) it creates an excessive entanglement of the government with religion.'
tags:
date: 2005-01-14 11:40:28
submitter: metric
effective: 1
support: 0.909091
oppose: 0.0909091
stancePos: 1
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 3
repliesOppose: 4
repliesTotal: 17
comments: 0
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.