-
oppose 80% · poor designmoderated to 100%; argued down by 20%
by wikipedia on 2005-03-26 05:34:51The argument from poor design [en.wikipedia.org] contests the existence of an intelligent Creator God by arguing that much of nature is poorly designed. -
oppose -53% · Re: poor designmoderated to 50%; argued down by 103%
by mshahrukhrao on 2005-11-11 21:31:52Firstly......If You say poorly Designed than design the universe yourself!If not So?Then What your inability shows! Secondly!How poorly you are designed(created)? -
oppose 100% · Re: poor designmoderated to 100%; argued down by 0%
by qkslvrwolf on 2006-01-13 20:44:31"God" is supposed to be omnipotent. I am not. However, if he were omnipotent, then, by my understanding of the defintion, I shouldn't be able to find stupid mistakes. Like a human's squashed sinuses and easily closable trachea. Secondly, you don't speak english very well.
summary
title: 'Re: poor design'
text: '"God" is supposed to be omnipotent. I am not. However, if he were omnipotent, then, by my understanding of the defintion, I shouldn't be able to find stupid mistakes. Like a human's squashed sinuses and easily closable trachea. Secondly, you don't speak english very well.'
tags:
date: 2006-01-13 20:44:31
submitter: qkslvrwolf
effective: 1
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 2
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 0
repliesTotal: 0
comments: 0
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.