'The "two party" system is bad for the US.'
[ support:45% : certainty:65 ] · [30 replies] · [1 comment]
arguments · summary
summary

title: 'Re: stability'
text: 'This weak argument can be further taken to say facism/dictatorships are even more stable, and thus, everyone should be ruled by one man, for coalitions sake. This is a ridiculous argument. The more people discussing points the better. It may take longer, but agreements reached will have greter support, unlike the "democratic" US, who would go against the majority, and applaud others for going aginst the majority of their peoples. Example, Turkey, who was criticised for following the democratic beliefs of its people, inn not helping the US illegally invade a country. At the same time, the US applauded people who joined them despite democratic agreement of less than 10% The US and its two party system care nothing about democracy or fairness, but in its unilateral self-serving hegemon.'
tags:
date: 2005-12-21 15:46:52
submitter: anonymous
effective: 0
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 0
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 0
repliesTotal: 0
comments: 0


Powered by Debatepoint.