'teach evolution instead of creationism'
[ support:54% : certainty:51 ] · [31 replies] ·
[0 comment]
-
support 100% · unconstitutionalmoderated to 100%; argued down by 0%
by metric on 2005-01-14 11:40:28Creationism fails the Lemon test established by the Supreme Court in Lemov vs. Kurtzman: Under the Lemon test, a government-sponsored message violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment if: (1) it does not have a secular purpose, (2) its principal or primary effect advances or inhibits religion, or (3) it creates an excessive entanglement of the government with religion. -
oppose -100% · Re: unconstitutionalmoderated to 0%; argued down by 0%
by anonymous on 2005-11-10 15:29:07Let's look at established history, most of the delegates of the constitutional Convention were Christians. So why would these God-Fearing men want to take Christianity out of schools even when some of them wrote state constitutions that made all public officials take an oath to be Christian. The case was wrong and the theory was wrong as the left-wing says “let’s encourage diversity in schools”.
summary
title: 'Re: unconstitutional'
text: 'Let's look at established history, most of the delegates of the constitutional Convention were Christians. So why would these God-Fearing men want to take Christianity out of schools even when some of them wrote state constitutions that made all public officials take an oath to be Christian. The case was wrong and the theory was wrong as the left-wing says “let’s encourage diversity in schools”.'
tags:
date: 2005-11-10 15:29:07
submitter: anonymous
effective: -1
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 0
stanceNeg: 0
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 0
repliesTotal: 0
comments: 0
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.