'teach evolution instead of creationism'
[ support:54% : certainty:51 ] · [31 replies] ·
[0 comment]
-
support 100% · unconstitutionalmoderated to 100%; argued down by 0%
by metric on 2005-01-14 11:40:28Creationism fails the Lemon test established by the Supreme Court in Lemov vs. Kurtzman: Under the Lemon test, a government-sponsored message violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment if: (1) it does not have a secular purpose, (2) its principal or primary effect advances or inhibits religion, or (3) it creates an excessive entanglement of the government with religion. -
support 100% · even faith-based education teaches evolutionmoderated to 100%; argued down by 0%
by anonymous on 2005-03-14 19:25:27My child's day-care has a missionary that teaches pre-school. It is religious-based and includes bible study and songs. However, she also teaches science and does not teach that everything sprung up overnight; but that Genesis lasted seven of God's days not ours. Interesting. -
oppose -100% · Re: even faith-based education teaches evolutionmoderated to 0%; argued down by 100%
by anonymous on 2005-11-10 15:22:04Actually it was 6 days of work and on the last day he rested. The foolish claim that religious organizations Actually teach evolution by saying 6-7 days just shows how desperate for "facts" evolutionists are. Even Darwin himself thought his theory was wrong!
summary
title: 'Re: even faith-based education teaches evolution'
text: 'Actually it was 6 days of work and on the last day he rested. The foolish claim that religious organizations Actually teach evolution by saying 6-7 days just shows how desperate for "facts" evolutionists are. Even Darwin himself thought his theory was wrong!'
tags:
date: 2005-11-10 15:22:04
submitter: anonymous
effective: -1
support: 0
oppose: 0
stancePos: 0
stanceNeg: 1
stanceEffective:
repliesSupport: 0
repliesOppose: 0
repliesTotal: 0
comments: 0
Powered by Debatepoint.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.